Glory X1 enhanced / millet routing 3/360P2 comparison evaluation: Which one hundred flagship strong?

With the development of technology and the improvement of living standards, optical fiber has entered every household. However, if you want your wireless device to enjoy the rapidity of optical fiber, you naturally need a router that supports the 5Ghz band. In today's hundred dollar price, the most representative is the glory route X1 enhanced version, millet router 3,360 security router P2. In contrast, what are the characteristics of these three products?





Exterior





In appearance design, Glory Route X1 enhanced version can be said to be the most distinctive of these three products. The minimalist Scandinavian design style, lightweight size, and built-in Balun antennae design make it difficult to perceive it as a router. In front of it there is a network status indicator, below the button named Hi, according to the official introduction of the Hi key can be used to expand the home network, can also be used as a WPS connection button. The logo of honor is printed on the top. Overall, the Glory Route X1 Plus is more like a neat little box, with a sweet white body and a small size that keeps it in all kinds of environments.





The millet routers 3 and 360, the security route P2, use the common design of the current route, a flat fuselage, and four antennas around the fuselage. However, the body of Xiaomi's router 3 uses white as its main color, and glory routing X1 enhanced version, and it looks more flat than the 360 ​​security route P2. The indicator light is on the lower part of the front, and all four antennas are printed with MIWIFI.





The 360 ​​security route P2 uses the design of the axis plus the main panel, which also allows the two antennas to rotate through the shaft to the bottom of the fuselage - although there is no value in use. The front 360 security route P2 is using silver as the main color, there are dense state indicators above.

Compared to traditional routing, these three models are considered to be relatively well-designed products, but I prefer the Enhanced X1 Enhanced Edition. After all, today's routers are not as lost in the corner as they used to be. They are more often placed on the table like crafts. Glory Route X1 enhanced the product to be so beautiful, the girls are even more self-confident when they are at home.

Features

Today's routers are pursuing the simplicity of setup, and all three routers pursue this design concept.

first time using





After connecting the device to Glory Route X1 Plus, the visiting web page will automatically jump to the configuration page of Glory Route X1 Plus. The entire configuration process is also very simple. Follow the prompts to configure the Wi-Fi password and access method. The same can be done in two simple steps on the phone. And if you forget the broadband password on the Internet, you don't need to worry about it. Just connect the old router to the X1 enhanced version of Glory Routing and it will automatically read the broadband account and password. This is something that the other two routers do not have.





When the 360 ​​security route P2 is used for the first time, the configuration method is similar to that of the Glory Route X1 enhanced version, and some simple settings can be performed. However, it is not understood that, as a product of a security vendor, 360 security routing P2 even checked the option of setting the Wi-Fi password as a routing management password by default. This undoubtedly left a potential threat to the router.





Millet Router 3 is similar to the previous two routers, but the experience with a detail is very poor. There is a Next button when the configuration is complete, but the click does not respond. After that, I discovered that the router was actually restarted after the previous configuration. The original Wi-Fi was opened and the password was set. At this time, the mobile phone did not connect to Wi-Fi (I didn't know the password, I was desperate to do so). After connecting manually, click Next to see the final screen. Although it did not have much impact, the user’s experience was discounted.

Background experience





In the background of the configuration page, glory routing X1 enhanced version of the external concise continues here. The home page shows the running status and network status of the router. Common real-time rates, Wi-Fi status, and route restarts can all be done on the home page. At the same time, Glory Routing X1 Plus will also use high-frequency WAN settings, Wi-Fi settings, and device management to form a single menu. The naming of functions is also very colloquial. This is the first time I have encountered the WAN setting. For the "I want to go online" router.





In more features you can find that many routers currently have Wi-Fi relays, time switches, guest Wi-Fi, parental controls, and glory routing X1 Plus. The more complicated functions such as UPnP, NAT service, and DMZ host are rarely used by ordinary users. Glory is still very helpful to many analysts. It is not difficult to see that the enhanced version of the Glory Routing X1 is taking the people-friendly route.





In contrast, the 360 ​​security route P2 does not have much information on the home page, but more of a feature button. However, the commonly used Internet settings, WiFi settings, and other home pages have obvious button guidance, reducing the complexity of the user's search.






In the function extension, it can be found that the advanced function 360 security route P2 possessed by mainstream routers also has its own. The one that surprised me most should be that 360 security route P2 has custom HOST function, compared with other functions, the custom HOST still has extremely high playability.





The home page of Millet Router 3's background also clearly shows the information about the router, including the router's status, network status, connected devices, and so on. There is a lot of data but the layout is good and there is no messy feeling.





Compared with the first two routes, Xiaomi Router 3 put Wi-Fi settings and Internet settings in common settings. Although not intuitive, finding them is not particularly troublesome. There are also many useful features that can be found in advanced settings such as QoS.





Overall, the design of the three routers in the background obsessed with the complex design interfaces of traditional routers, each with its own characteristics, and it was very easy to use. There was no problem with the entry of functions that could not be found. And these three routers support the configuration of the mobile phone APP to the router. What about the experience?













The coverage of the functions of the three mobile phone APPs of the routers is also very complete, regardless of the commonly used network settings, Wi-Fi settings, or the features of each section of the router can be configured. However, the glory routing X1 enhanced version of the APP only need to verify the router password can be used, and the latter two you must register an account to bind the router to operate, for such a level setting I am very puzzled. In addition to the technical house, the sister, and the white guys will love the two steps to complete the glory routing X1 enhanced version.

performance

Performance configuration is a prerequisite to ensure the user experience, and the configurations of these three routers also have their own characteristics.





The configuration of the Glory Routing X1 Plus can be the most luxurious of the three. When the 40nm chip is widely used in the industry, the glory route X1 enhanced version has taken the lead in using the 28nm main chip, and the fine-grained increase means that more electronic components can be tucked into the volume, which also makes the glory routing X1 enhanced performance 33% increase, power consumption is reduced by 20%; and during the work process, heat will be lower, and the Internet experience will be smoother, faster, and more stable.

In addition, the glory routing X1 enhanced version also uses a new generation of 802.11AC MU-MIMO, in terms of transmission capabilities compared to the first generation of 802.11AC technology has advantages, multi-device access speed increase in the case of access Nearly 20%. Affected by the cost, this technology is mostly carried on a router of the order of a thousand dollars, and it is surprising that the enhanced version of the Glory Routing X1 brings it to the one hundred yuan file.





The configuration of the 360 ​​security route P2 and the millet router 3 at the same price can also be called the flagship. Both are equipped with MediaTek MT7628 and MTK7620A processors and support 802.11AC wireless technology.

All three offer a 10M/100Mbps adaptive self-adaptive WAN port, but on the LAN port, Glory Router X1 Plus and Millet Router 3 provide two, and 360 Security Router P2 provides four. However, in the current situation where home devices support wireless, 2 are enough for home use.





When testing the three products, we found a small detail. 2.4G supports stronger wall-through performance and wider coverage; while 5G has faster advantages, but its coverage is less than 2.4G, so many routers choose to transmit two bands of Wi-Fi to distinguish, 360 This is the case for the secure route P2. But this kind of meaning is not significant. Do users still need to choose their own optimal network in the process of moving around in different rooms? This undoubtedly increases the burden on user operations.

The glory routing X1 enhanced version and millet router 3 have already supported dual-band optimization. That is, the router will combine two frequency bands of Wi-Fi into one, and the router will select the optimal network to provide the equipment with advantages. Yes: The user can enjoy both the high speed brought by 5G and the convenience brought by 2.4G wide coverage without any switching perception. This advantage undoubtedly greatly enhances the user experience. However, in the actual experience, the glory X1 enhanced version is more stable for dual-frequency switching, and can automatically switch to the 5G frequency band when entering the 5G coverage from the 2.4G coverage area. The router has already helped the user to make it unconsciously. A better choice; while the millet router still remains at 2.4G, requiring users to reconnect to enter 5G, the experience is slightly worse.





In fact, how do these three routers perform? We have conducted some tests on them.

Signal coverage test

Test Tool: WirelessMon

Test Equipment: Surface Pro 4





Test environment is shown in the figure (the AP is the location of the router)





The author's test environment has a feature that is particularly around the Wi-Fi (WirelessMon can detect 205), which is particularly high for the router to select the channel and maintain stability, but found in the test, 360 security routing P2 does not support In order to ensure fairness, we will turn off the other two dual-band ones and test the 2.4Ghz band and the 5Ghz band separately.

Point A





The point A is separated from the router by a wall, but the difference in signal strength between the three signals in the 2.4Ghz band is very close, but the 5Ghz results are different.





Although the 5Ghz signal has less interference, it has a very high requirement for the environment. Under normal circumstances, the wireless signal strength below -60dBm (ie, the greater the value) is normal, it is not difficult to see from the figure, in the A point glory routing X1 enhanced version performs better, 360 security routing P2 ranked second, and millet Router 3 performed poorly and was 10 dBm lower than the glory route X1 enhanced version.

Point B





Point B is also separated by a wall, and the two points are similar. In the 2.4Ghz frequency band all three are good, glory route X1 enhanced version of the best performance, strength reached -29dBm, 360 security routing P2 and millet router 3 are similar, were -32dBm and -35dBm.





In the 5Ghz band, the glory route X1 enhanced version also achieved the best results of the three, the signal strength of -53dBm, while the 360 ​​security route P2 is -60dBm, barely reach the normal level.

C point





The C-distance route has two wall barriers. In this environment, the coverage of the 5Ghz band has been slightly "difficult". The 5Ghz signal of the 360-security route P2 and the millet router 3 is at the level of -75 dBm, and the 360-security route P2 Time-consuming problems also occur during connection. Surprisingly, however, the glory route X1 enhanced version leads them 10 dBm, only -66dBm.





This result is also reflected in the 2.4Ghz, glory route X1 enhanced version signal strength is -51dBm, millet router 3 is -53dBm, and 360 is -61dBm, dumped by the top two a small cut.

From a comprehensive point of view, although the 360 ​​security route P2 and the millet router 3 use external antennas, the glory route X1 enhanced version tells us by virtue of its excellent algorithm and technology: "It's a definite theory" is not desirable.

Throughput test

Test Tool: IxChariot

Test Equipment: Surface Pro 4

Connect a computer for wired access and use another device to test with IxChariot's built-in script ThroughPut in the 5Ghz frequency band. Since the default file is too small, we have increased the file size by 10 times.

The test results are as follows:





(360 Security Route P2)





(Glory Route X1 Plus)





(Millet router 3)

The completion time of the three is relatively close. As a whole, the glory route X1 enhanced version and the millet router 3 can be maintained at 93 Mbps, but the number of times that the millet router 3 is slowed down is obviously more, and the glory route X1 enhanced version is among the three. The smoothest but slower start. The 360 ​​security route P2 performed well in the early stage but then actually dropped to 61 Mbps, which is 30 Mbps lower than the highest rate, which is equivalent to three times the difference between the other two speeds. It is indeed an exaggeration.

to sum up





When testing the three routers, I asked many of my friends about what they valued when they purchased the router. Most of the answers they gave me were: appearance, wall penetration, and stability. Only a few friends said performance. Indeed, performance is only a guarantee for the user experience, but we can't talk about experience without performance. Just as the glory routing X1 and the millet router 3 have the same convenience and convenience as the dual-band.

In the past few days, the use of these three products, they give me is not a performance feel like fierce, Glory Route X1 enhanced version gives me a simple and stylish, close to the feeling of close to the people, from the experience is not difficult to find glory Very much want to make this product easy to use, while stable and practical; millet router 3 seems to be a pan-family platform, plug-in, smart products supporting the connection are all see Millet want to take the router to do smart home entrance ambition; Although the 360 ​​security route P2 seems to be the main security, but it is not difficult to find from his mobile phone APP, it seems that he also has the same ambition as Xiaomi.

Taken together, the enhanced version of the Glory Route X1 is both external and internal, both technically and aesthetically, and is more comprehensive in its use of new technologies. It can be said that it has changed the image of “Polytechnic male” who has always been honored in my heart. A more outstanding appearance ... ... man.

The glorious route X1 enhanced version has been sold on Huawei Mall and Jingdong on the 24th. The price is only 149 yuan. It can be said that it is a conscience. Also released is the flagship glory play "Glory for Youth" which plays 6A. "Growing lasts more quickly." Glory enjoys the flat 2 series. "Let your heart move" Glory bracelet A2 to meet the diversity of consumers. Demand, so that every consumer can find the most suitable for their own products, let go fun new experiences.





Smart TV/box information can focus on smart TV information network sofa butler (http://), China's influential TV box and smart TV website, providing information, communication, etc. on TV boxes, smart TVs, smart TV software, etc. Answering questions.


85W Macbook Charger

macbook charger


The 85W Macbook Charger MagSafe 1 or MagSafe 2 Power Adapter features a magnetic DC connector so if someone should trip over it, the cord disconnects harmlessly and your MacBook Pro stays put safely. It also helps prevent fraying or weakening of the cables over time. In addition, the magnetic DC helps guide the plug into the system for a quick and secure connection.

When the connection is secure, an LED located at the head of the DC connector lights up; an amber light lets you know that your notebook is charging, while a green light tells you that you have a full charge. An AC cord is provided with the adapter for maximum cord length, while the AC wall adapter (also provided) gives you an even easier and more compact way to travel.

Designed to be the perfect traveling companion, the adapter has a clever design which allows the DC cable to be wound neatly around itself for easy cable storage.

This power adapter recharges the lithium polymer battery while the system is off, on, or in sleep mode. It also powers the system if you choose to operate without a battery.

Compatible with MacBook Pro with Retina display.

Not sure if this is the right power adapter for your Mac?
See this article for more details about choosing the right one.

Knowing which specific Mac model you have is important.

Please contact with me, that I can tell you about your Mac model and generation will be displayed.

macbook 85w charger,apple macbook 85w charger,85w charger for macbook pro

Shenzhen Waweis Technology Co., Ltd. , https://www.szwaweischarger.com